Writing Advice

An act that you do with your heart

sky-blue-writting

Depending on the document type, you will need to figure out how to start. If you barely have an idea of how it should look, search for references first.


Who Are You Writing This For?

Know who this is for.

Personally, I write thinking of myself: the version of me who has forgotten everything. That tends to be the right level of detail.

Review

It is easier to spot a bad movie than to explain what it does well. And when you try, you usually end up with a bunch of clichés. The same applies to writing: you know something feels off before you can articulate why.

What to Look for

We tend to leave out information when writing because we skip the obvious to keep things simple, which is not necessarily bad. The trick is to know when skipping something actually loses the reader.

A few tips:

What to Avoid

AIs and ChatGPT

As you may already know, in a company context you should avoid passing sensitive information through these services. If you do use them (for whatever valid reason), at least do not do it carelessly. Uploading an entire document just to rewrite two lines of text is a risky trade-off.

To put it simply: if someone asks how you are doing and they respond with a lengthy breakdown of the geopolitical situation before getting to the point, it comes across as odd. The same principle applies to documents. More is not always better.

Prompts

Let’s say you need a quick context section for a document on the Cold Start issue affecting AWS Lambdas inside VPCs. A plain answer would be: “Lambdas running inside VPCs are slower to start because allocating internal networking resources takes more time than public ones that are always ready.”

But here is how the same request plays out with slightly different prompts in ChatGPT 3.5:

If you are going to wade through a lot of filler just to get to the essential point of a document, that is a problem. Going deep into a topic is fine, but be aware of who you are writing for. Is this a “From Zero to Hero” course or a document people will skim in a pinch?

You should not need to go into full Prompt Engineering mode just to get a clean paragraph. A few things worth trying:

If you only need a grammar check, Grammarly is worth it. The paid version saves a lot of proofreading time, and the rewrite suggestions are genuinely useful when you are stuck on a sentence.

Prompts for Editing Your Own Work

Where AI tools actually save time is in the small, repetitive edits, the kind where you know something is off but do not want to rewrite the whole thing from scratch. The key is being specific about what you want to preserve.

Keeping the Tone

Use these when the content is good but the phrasing needs work, and you do not want it coming back sounding like a press release.

The last one sounds obvious but it is the most useful. It tells the model that the voice is intentional and should be preserved.

Trimming Without Losing the Point

Use these when a paragraph is doing too much and you need it to breathe.

The difference between these and a generic “summarize” prompt is that you are giving it permission to cut, not just compress.

Adjusting Formality

Use these when the audience changes and the text needs to follow.

Surgical Edits

Use these when most of the text is fine and you only need one part fixed.

Scoping the instruction to one part of the text is often more useful than asking for a full rewrite. It gives you something concrete to compare rather than a new version you have to evaluate from scratch.

Matching Tone Across Sections

Use this when you have written two sections at different times and they feel like they were written by different people, because they were.

Removing the AI Voice

Use these when something you wrote, or something a tool generated, that sounds too polished, too structured, or just a bit hollow.


None of these replace actually knowing what you want to say. But if the thought is there and the sentence is not cooperating, one of these will usually unstick it faster than staring at the screen.

Advice for the Young at Heart

Adding more text does not improve a document. It usually makes it harder to read. ChatGPT tends to target a certain length to sound thorough and engaging, but clarity and conciseness beat length every time.

ChatGPT is useful, but it is like using Mahoraga. It depends entirely on how you wield it.